Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an interface to easily define such commands. So If not, what can I do so that I can use it? ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] overleftrightarrow

2007-07-19 Thread Aditya Mahajan
Quoting Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sat, 30 Jun 2007, Mojca Miklavec wrote: Consider \def\myvec#1{\overrightharpoonup{#1}} $(\myvec{\imath},\myvec{\jmath},\myvec{k})$ or $\myvec{\nabla}$, $\myvec{\sigma}$, $\myvec{r}$, ... The base size on top of i, j, k, ... is just too long and

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-11 Thread Jesse Alama
the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least, it is not available by default. I tried

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-11 Thread Aditya Mahajan
. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-07-01 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: But to sum up: I really like your patch, and I vote for its inclusion. (The most annoying problem is stil open though.) don't worry, since Aditya is now mostly responsible for the math stuff in context, the patches will be integrated when he thinks they're ok, unless of

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-30 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On 6/29/07, Aditya Mahajan wrote: Actually just adding overleftrightarrow is easy, but better will be an interface to easily define such commands. So If not, what can I do so that I can use it? ConTeXt uses overleftarrow and overrightarrow as defined in plain tex. This does not work

[NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-28 Thread Jesse Alama
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the \overleftarrow and \overrightarrow commands, but one thing I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow

Re: [NTG-context] \overleftrightarrow

2007-06-28 Thread Aditya Mahajan
I'd like to have is \overleftrightarrow, for typesetting the symbol customarily used to denote the line determined by two points. It seems, though, that this isn't available in ConTeXt, or, at least, it is not available by default. I tried looking on the contextgarden and google, but didn't